The answer depends on what counts as a cost. A global computer worm can generate billions of dollars in estimated cleanup and lost productivity across many organizations. A breach at one company produces a narrower, often better-documented bill. The ranking below uses commonly cited nominal dollar estimates to compare both kinds of attack. It is a guide to their reported economic scale, not an audited league table: estimates for older worms are especially uncertain, and the figures have not been adjusted for inflation.
1. MyDoom: approximately $38 billion
First identified back in 2004, MyDoom propagated via email attachments, infecting systems with extraordinary velocity. Furthermore, it facilitated distributed denial-of-service assaults, wherein numerous compromised devices flood a target with overwhelming traffic.
The often-cited $38 billion figure represents an estimate of worldwide damage, including disruption and recovery work, rather than money stolen by the attackers. Its scale illustrates how a self-propagating attack can impose small costs on enormous numbers of victims, though the precise total is difficult to verify.
2. Sobig: approximately $37.1 billion
The Sobig family of email worms circulated in 2003. Its best-known variant, Sobig.F, spread through infected messages and helped turn compromised computers into a distribution network for further malicious activity.
The frequently quoted $37.1 billion estimate combines broad assumptions about infection, lost productivity, and cleanup. As with MyDoom, it should be read as a historical model of global impact, not as a documented bill paid by one organization.
3. Klez: approximately $19.8 billion
Klez started circulating back in 2001 and continued to cause issues throughout 2002. Various strains took advantage of flaws within email applications, capable of masking the true origin of a message, which consequently made compromised correspondence much harder for users to spot.
Its commonly cited cost of about $19.8 billion reflects the cumulative burden of a widespread outbreak: removing infections, restoring systems, and dealing with interrupted work. The estimate is widely repeated but lacks the precision of a modern company’s reported expenses.
4. Sasser: approximately $18 billion
Sasser emerged in 2004 and exploited a vulnerability in Microsoft Windows. Unlike the email worms mentioned earlier, it propagated across susceptible machines without requiring users to open attachments. System crashes, unexpected reboots, and widespread disruption to corporate and public sector operations were among its primary consequences.
An approximately $18 billion worldwide cost is often attributed to the outbreak. The lesson was clear even where losses could not be measured precisely: unpatched systems could allow an infection to travel faster than organizations could respond.
5. ILOVEYOU: approximately $15 billion
The ILOVEYOU worm appeared in 2000 as an email attachment accompanied by an enticing message. When opened, it spread through the victim’s contacts and damaged or replaced certain files. Organizations around the world had to disconnect email systems and clean infected computers.
Estimates regarding the extent of the harm differ significantly; $15 billion is a frequently referenced higher-end amount, rather than a finalized financial tally. This assault continues to stand as a prime illustration of how an uncomplicated social-engineering bait can magnify a technical danger.
6. NotPetya: approximately $10 billion
NotPetya struck in 2017. It initially spread through compromised updates to widely used Ukrainian accounting software, then moved through corporate networks. Although it resembled ransomware, its destructive design left many victims unable to recover their data by paying.
The White House estimated worldwide losses at more than $10 billion. Global businesses suffered major damage: shipping company Maersk reported rebuilding large parts of its technology infrastructure, while other multinational firms faced disrupted production and distribution. Unlike many older worm estimates, NotPetya’s total is supported by substantial publicly reported losses from individual companies, although the full global cost remains an estimate.
7. Conficker: approximately $9 billion
Discovered in 2008, Conficker exploited a Windows vulnerability and built a large network of infected computers. It also used techniques that made removal and containment difficult. Its persistence forced organizations to spend time identifying vulnerable machines, applying updates, and cleaning infections.
A figure near $9 billion is often repeated for its worldwide impact, but the basis for that precise amount is not transparent. Conficker belongs on lists of economically significant attacks; its exact placement in a cost ranking is much less certain.
8. WannaCry: approximately $4 billion
In 2017, WannaCry ransomware spread rapidly by exploiting a Windows vulnerability. It encrypted files and demanded payment, but the broader economic harm came from interrupted operations and recovery efforts.
The United Kingdom’s National Health Service became one of its most visible victims, with disrupted appointments and services. Around $4 billion is a frequently cited estimate of global losses, not a measure of ransom paid. The contrast matters: attackers can collect relatively little while victims bear enormous costs.
9. Change Healthcare: approximately $3.1 billion in reported 2024 impact
A 2024 ransomware attack on Change Healthcare disrupted a major part of the United States health payment and claims system. Providers struggled with billing and cash flow, while patients and organizations faced uncertainty about exposed information.
Parent organization UnitedHealth Group disclosed approximately $3.1 billion in financial consequences linked to the 2024 cyberattack. As a metric disclosed directly by the enterprise, this amount differs from the projected global estimates mentioned previously. Furthermore, it fails to account for every secondary expense absorbed by clinics, healthcare facilities, and patients.
10. Code Red: approximately $2.6 billion
Code Red spread in 2001 by exploiting a vulnerability in Microsoft web server software. It infected vulnerable servers, defaced some websites, and generated traffic intended to overwhelm a target.
Its commonly cited $2.6 billion cost reflects estimates of lost productivity and the work required to protect and repair systems. Like the other early-worm figures, it is best treated as an indication of scale rather than an exact total.
How to read the ranking
These attacks did not all cause loss in the same way. Early worms reached vast numbers of machines, so their headline figures rely heavily on assumptions about time spent cleaning and restoring them. NotPetya combined worldwide spread with severe, documented corporate disruption. Change Healthcare shows how an attack on one critical intermediary can create large costs beyond the company itself.
For that reason, a different method—ranking only audited expenses, adjusting for inflation, or including all indirect costs—would produce a different top 10. The common thread is more useful than the precise order: cyberattacks become most expensive when they exploit a widely shared weakness or interrupt a service on which many others depend.
